WELCOME

Thank you for visiting. I hope you come often and leave comments. As a technology trainer for all ages (elementary, secondary and adults) I come across information that amaze and saddens me. I plan to share this informatin with you. This is a learning experience so the stories are real, the names and sometimes places may be changed. Some stories should make you laugh, some may make you cry but they all present learning opportunities.



Saturday, June 25, 2011

COURSE REFLECTION

DISTANCE EDUCATION'S FUTURE




From 1953 - 1956 there was a television situation comedy (sitcom) called The Honeymooners The show centered around a married couple; Ralph Kramden, his wife Alice and their married friends and neighbors Ed and Trixie Norton. In one episode, Alice is upset because Ed brought Trixie a television and Ralph refused to purchase one for her. Ralph and Alice get into an intense argument wherein Alice demands to know why Ralph will not buy her a TV. Ralph replies, "Because I'm waiting for 3D TV" (Katsigeorgis, J., 1995). The audience burst into laughter. In the 1950's, when television was in its infancy, 3D TV was a preposterous notation.




As a young girl watching reruns of this show in the 1970s, I remember being doubled over with laughter the first time I saw this episode. The notion was silly. Fast-forward 60 years after this inane statement from Ralph Kramden and 40 years since my childhood and its here, 3D television. The same is true of the cell phones, computers, and other gadgets encountered on space age television shows. Episode after episode, children all over America watched people communicate with hand held devices resembling the current day iPhone and iPad. The high tech dream ware of one generation became commonplace tools for another!

Over the next 5 - 10 years, continued advances in face-to-face communication devices like Face-Time for the iPad2, webcams, and Skype will make the visual and auditory elements of distant learning better. In 10-20 years, it will be thoroughly ingrained in all aspects of learning and at every level of our educational system. Students will learn more in less time; contact with subject matter experts will be commonplace, and all instructors will have backgrounds and experience as instructional designers and course facilitators. While it will never replace the traditional classroom, we will look back and wonder what the fuss was about.

As an instructional designer, there are several things that can be done to improve the perception of distance learning and serve as a positive force.







  1. Lead by example. In addition to teaching and facilitating online courses, the instructional designer must be committed to taking classes online. This action can serve as continued professional development, a method to acquire prospective from other instructors, and to maintain a student's prospective.



  2. Become an advocate for distance learning now! Technologies also change the ways in which learning takes place (Partnership for 21st Century Learning). For grades 3 and up, find a way to add an online component. Educational experiences that are enabled by mobile devices and applications provide a multitude of un-tethered opportunities for students to be more engaged in learning and extend the learning process beyond the classroom (Project Tomorrow 2011 pp7).This can be as easy as moving short constructed response questions or picture prompt worksheets into an online format.



  3. Develop courses that meet or exceed the highest professional standards. Require this of yourself and others in your circle of influence. In addition, speak up when poor quality and workmanship is evident.






Resources:
Katsigeorgis, J., (March 29, 1995). The Honeymooners. Retrieved on June 25, 2011 from http://www.honeymooners.net/
Article: Partnership for 21st Century Skills. The Intellectual and Policy Foundations of the 21st Century Skills Framework. Retrieved on June 16, 2011 from http://www.education.rec.ri.cmu.edu/roboticscurriculum/research/21st%20Centery%20Skills%20Framework.pdf
Project Tomorrow, 2011 (April 2011). The New 3 E's of Education: Enabled Engaged Empowered: How Today's Students are Leveraging Emerging Technologies for Learning. Retrieved April 27, 2011 from http://www.tomorrow.org/speakup/pdfs/SU10_3EofEducation(Students).pdf%20%20

Sunday, June 19, 2011

Converting to a Distance Learning Course

Greetings:

The PDF file below provides an assessment and information on how to convert a face-to-face course to an online course. At the end of the document there is a form that can be used for this endeavor.

When moving from a face-to-face to an online environment, there are several features to consider, mainly, the reason for moving to an online format, the course and/or segments of courses that will be offered online, the technical support needed by students and instructors, and lastly the mechanisms to monitor the effectiveness of the online course. During the pre-planning stage, one of the most important things a trainer should do is evaluate student readiness. Students at a distance have to assume more responsibility for their own learning earlier in the process than do those students who are enrolled in traditional classes (Simonson, et al., 2009, pp168). If students are not independent, they are likely to fail. Secondly, the trainer must investigate background and prior knowledge in terms of course content and skills, including the use of computers and multimedia technologies. The availability of additional tutoring, pre-placement testing, and help desk services may require investigation during the pre-planning stage. When an Instructor accounts for the background and prior knowledge of students, the learning setting is more successful (Simonson, et al., 2009, pp168). Lastly, the trainer must ask questions about the infrastructure (hardware and software resources), and whether the communications network can handle the additional load from the online course.
Course discussions could be significantly enhanced. Students can be trained (video and print) on how to participate in an online discussion forum. The trainer can provide samples, detailed directions, and examples on how to post; all of which students can access anytime anywhere. This will enable the extension of discussions over several days rather than a class period.


The role of the trainer will change as the course moves from an Instructor-Centered, face-to-face course to a Student-Centered one. The trainer has six critical roles; that of a guide, mentor, catalyst, coach, feedback-giver, and resource-provider (Prestera, et al, April 2001). The intensity of each role will change as the students move through the course. For example, at the beginning of the course, students may require more guidance, feedback, and help acquiring or using resources. As they become more independent, the intensity of these roles lessen and other roles like that of coach or mentor intensifies.
The trainer must ensure student participation in the course. Every effort must be made to provide shy students with a nonthreatening means for participating in discussions (Simonson, et al, pp194). Suggested steps for the trainer are listed below.



  1. Describe the background and prior knowledge needed to successfully complete the course.

  2. Describe the resources (hardware, software, and printed materials) needed for the course. Special attention should be paid to software. For example, if Adobe Professional will be used extensively in the course then it should be stated at the beginning. A list of online training resources would also be helpful.

  3. Provide clear and concise instructions for the discussion post, including the topic, question(s) to answer, and due date.

  4. Provide samples of graded posts that range from failing to excellent. Add comments that explain why one grade was a 5 (excellent) and another was a 1 (failure).

  5. Place learners in small groups of no more than 10 people.

  6. Closely monitor discussions. Ensure misinformation is not accepted as fact, that the discussion threads do not go off track, and that erroneous information is not shared (Simonson, et al, pp187).

  7. Use "weaving" skills to keep the discussion on target while not inhibiting the value of all discussion (Hiemstra, 1994).

  8. Provide detailed feedback in a timely manner, including writing resources, observed problems, and ways to improve one's score.

  9. Send e-mail messages to individual students or student groups to alert them to problems associated with inactivity, lateness, or quality of communications, before their grade is adversly impacted.

Exhibit 1, located at the end of this document is a checklist that can be used by the trainer as preparation for converting to an online class. The exhibit contains three sections, one for the course, one for the student, and one for the equipment.


References:
Austin Community College (April 2010). IDS Distance Learning Project Retrieved on June 17, 2011 from http://irt.austincc.edu/ids/dlproject
Hiemstra, R., (1994). Computerized Distance Education: The Role for Facilitators Retrieved on June 14, 2011 from http://www-distance.syr.edu/mpaea.html

Prestera, G. and Moller, L. (April, 2001). Facilitating Asynchronous Distance Learning:
Exploiting Opportunities for Knowledge Building in Asynchronous Distance Learning Environments. Retrieved on June 15, 2011 from http://frank.mtsu.edu/~itconf/proceed01/3.html

Simonson, M., Sandino, S., Albright, M., Zvacek, S., (2009). Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education: Chapter 13 Evaluating Teaching and Learning at a Distance (4th Ed). Boston, Ma.



EXHIBIT 1. TRANSITION CHECKLIST


This is a checklist designed to assist the trainer in pre-planning the move of a course from face-to-face to online.

SECTION 1. COURSE FOCUSED QUESTIONS
1. Title of course to be transitioned from face-to-face to online.
2. Duration of course (units of hours): 3. Number of students per class:
4. Briefly describe the course objective(s):
5. List in order the steps (objectives or goals) used to fulfill the course objectives stated above.
6. For each step listed above, complete the table below.




  • Step #


  • Step Name


  • Print Media used Multimedia Used


  • Assignment(s)


  • Assessment(s)

7. For each step listed in 6, above, which ones would you like to change to an online environment?




  • All course components:


  • Steps:

8. For the steps listed in 7, above, complete the table below.





  • Step #




  • Mechanism used for delivery now. What is needed to move the component online. Include all resources; hardware, software, venue (PDF file, video, audio) and storage requirements if known.




  • Are resources readily available? Reply Yes or No



  • For all "No" replies, state what is needed. Be specific.


9. Re-examine and modify the information contained in Steps 1 through 8 as needed. For the information contained in Step 8, which ones can be placed online now. Do not list those steps that require acquisition of additional resources.




  • Step #


  • Step Title


SECTION 2. STUDENT FOCUSED QUESTIONS
1. Has the student population taken an online or hybrid course recently (within the last year)?
Yes No


2. Do students have experience using the following technological tools. Check all that apply.
2a Using a computer Yes No
2b Word-processing Yes No
2c Creating audio files Yes No
2d Creating video file Yes No
2e Accessing the Internet Yes No
2f Email Yes No
2g Cell Phone Yes No
2h Texting Yes No
2i You Tube Yes No
2j iTunes Yes No

3. Are the students prepared for an online learning environment?
Yes No
If the answer is Yes, move on to Section 3. Equipment Focused Questions.

4. What additional skills and/or training will students need to prepare them for online learning? Complete the table below.
Area of concern What they already know. What they need to know for online learning. Resources needed. Be specific. Are the Resources readily available (in-house) Yes or No




  1. Using a computer


  2. Word-processing


  3. Creating audio files


  4. Creating video file


  5. Accessing the Internet


  6. Email


  7. Other 1


  8. Other 2


  9. Other 3

For all No responses in 4, above, state whether additional funding is needed and estimate how much money is require.
List areas of concern with a No reply.
Estimate the aunt of money needed to acquire the resource.



SECTION 3. EQUIPMENT FOCUSED QUESTIONS
Review and modify (as needed) the information in Sections 1 and 2 before completing this section. Complete the table below.




  • List the equipment needed for the online course. Be specific and make sure to include a list of d system requirements (i.e., sound card, 2G memory, etc.)


  • Is pre-course training needed? Answer Yes or No.


  • If you answered Yes, how will students get/receive pre-course training?


  • Is technical support needed? Answer Yes or No


  • If you answered Yes, how will students get help?


  • Student Equipment Requirements


  • Company Equipment Requirements


Sunday, June 5, 2011

DISTANCE LEARNING: PART 1




Distance Learning Part 1



DESIGNING FOR DISTANCE LEARNING:PART 1



The assignment for this week was to select and analyze a free Open Course. The course I selected was from Open Yale courses. The title of the course was Environmental Politics and Law with Professor John P. Wargo. The URL for the course is http://oyc.yale.edu/environmental-studies/environmental-politics-and-law. After reviewing the course, the following four areas of concern were noted; a) antiquated appearance of the material; absence of transition from face-to-face lecture; absence of activities that promote learning and collaboration; and a missed opportunity to integrate multimedia technologies that enhance learning and understanding. Each concern will be addressed in the paragraphs below.


The first concern is the age of the course. The course appears "old," antiquated. One reason may be the Professor's monotone voice. Some of the video clips used by the professor dated back to the 1950s based on the mannerism, wardrobe, and Technicolor appearance of the clips. Technicolor was the second major color motion picture process, after Britain's Kinemacolor, and the most widely used color process in Hollywood from 1922 to 1952 (Wikipedia 2011). This surprised me because course structure information stated the course was recorded in the Spring, 2010 and placed on Open Yale in 2011. Perhaps the professor has used the same lecture material since the 1970s.


Secondly, the course appears to have been dumped on the web. It looks as though the Media Department went to every class in the Spring 2010, taped each class, and then placed the material online. Several things led me to this conclusion. The first was information contained in the course structure overview that states the course is taught twice per week for 50 minutes, and was recorded for Open Yale Courses in the Spring 2010 (Open Yale Courses 2011b). Meeting twice a week for a 12-week semester equates to 24 lectures, which is exactly the number of videos presented in the class session page. When you look at the videos, they resemble a typical college lecture. The professor is at the podium or walking in front of the slideshow talking for almost 50-minutes, very few questions are asked, basic PowerPoint presentations are projected to a wide screen, and students leave the lecture hall. When videos are played, the on-line viewer gets to watch the Professor watch the video. In essence, the interaction is between the professor and students without any acknowledgement that there is or will be an on-line viewer. Shovelware is the term that comes to mind. The term shovelware has evolved to describe this practice: Shovel the course onto the web and say you are teaching online, but did not think about it (Simonson pp248).


The third issue is an absence of activities that promote learning and collaboration. In order for distance education to be effective, the focus must move from Instructor focused to learner focused. This philosophy of education has become known as student-centered learning because it strongly promotes active learning, collaboration, mastery of course material, and student control over the learning process (Simonson pp232). A review of the syllabus reveals a paper or midterm and final exam as 90% of the grading. Several short assignments will be prepared by the student. There are no projects or activities designed to ensure learning, nor is there interaction between the learners. Open Yale Courses is not designed to offer users the opportunity to interact with Yale faculty (Yale Open Course, 2011a). Additionally, the online learner receives no training on how to use the course web site.


The last concern is the missed opportunity to integrate the powers of the web. The web offers powerful opportunities for resource utilization, collaboration, and communication (Simonson pp250). Instead of standing in front of the podium talking, it would have been more engaging to display animated clips of radiation formation and leakage, or movement of mercury and pesticides into the human food chain.


The topic is relevant and interesting. The course, with a little boost can be used to engage and recruit both the face-to-face and on-line learner.


RESOURCES:

Open Yale Courses (2011a) About Open House Yale. Retrieved on June 2, 2011 from http://oyc.yale.edu/about#q6

Open Yale Courses (2011b) Environmental Politics and Law with Professor John P. Wargo. Retrieved on June 1, 2011 from http://oyc.yale.edu/environmental-studies/environmental-politics-and-law

Simonson, M., Sandino, S., Albright, M., Zvacek, S., (2009). Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education (4th Ed). Boston, Ma.

Wikipedia (2011). Technicolor. Retrieved on June 6, 2011 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technicolor